Brandi Levy Wiki – Brandi Levy Bio
Brandi Levy is a former high school cheerleader who argued that she could not be punished by her public school for posting a profanity-laced caption on Snapchat when she was off school grounds.
Supreme Court rules for high-school cheerleader Brandi Levy in free-speech case over Snapchat post.
She is 18 years old.
Brandi Levy Snapchat Post
The case involving a Pennsylvania teenager was closely watched to see how the court would handle the free speech rights of some 50 million public school children and the concerns of schools over off-campus and online speech that could amount to a disruption of the school’s mission or rise to the level of bullying or threats.
“F–k school f–k softball f–k cheer f–k everything,” Brandi Levy, then 14, wrote in 2017. She was reacting to the fact that she had failed to get a spot on the varsity squad at Mahanoy Area High School in Mahanoy City, Pennsylvania, as a junior varsity cheerleader.
When school officials learned of the outburst, Levy was suspended from the JV team to violate school rules. But her lawyers sued, alleging the school had violated her freedom of speech. Levy is now 18 and a freshman at Bloomsburg University.
Levy lauded the justices’ decision on Wednesday, saying in a statement: “The school went too far, and I’m glad that the Supreme Court agrees.”
“Young people need to have the ability to express themselves without worrying about being punished when they get to school,” she said. “I never could have imagined that one simple snap would turn into a Supreme Court case, but I’m proud that my family and I advocated for the rights of millions of public school students.”
The Supreme Court extended its protection of student speech to social media on Wednesday by an 8-1 ruling that a Pennsylvania school district overstepped its authority by punishing a high-school cheerleader who used a vulgar word on Snapchat when she didn’t make the varsity cheerleading team.
The court said some occasions when schools could reach beyond campus to regulate student speech, mentioning bullying and cheating as subjects to discipline whether they occur in the classroom or cyberspace.
But the court has long held that even on campus, students retain First Amendment rights to speak on controversial matters so long as they don’t cause a substantial disruption. Moreover, beyond school grounds, administrators’ power to punish students diminishes. Further, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court.
In this instance, “the school’s interest in teaching good manners is not sufficient, in this case, to overcome [the student’s] interest in free expression,” Justice Breyer wrote, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.